Have you ever counter this kind of situation????? Your results was not significant or even worse the relationship is negative?????? This scenario is the worst case scenario.. if you don't how to handle that... Just imagine... you hardly write your literature mentioned that there must be positively related or negatively related to your DV... but the end.. the test wont support your hypothesis????
What should you do??? Adjust the literature??? OMG... that is terrible... adjust your data??? NO.. is is unethical... then???? End of your study??? That is disaster....
Don't worry dear... it also happend to me last time.. and i just wanna to cry thinking about that without any explanation....
Actually... that is the beauty of your study.., and believed me.. you will got more citation after this if your study are against from past studies... Am i kidding you ??? It is a bad JOKE?????
Nope.. it is true.. especially nowadays.. most of the students are looking to use a moderator for their study and while they wanna to use a moderating factor... there MUST be inconsistency in the literature.... SEE... now you gave them a great help ... now they can use the moderating factor because of your study..... hahahahahaha...
But.. before that.. when have this kind of results... you must argue and explain it logically base on your understanding the environment of your study according to the real situation.. only you know what is happening in your study.. if you could argue that.. it means you understood what are you studying about...
Foe example.... why a sky juice will cause you RM 5.90 in the 5 star hotel and it is only cost you 20 cents in the mamak stall and cost you nothing in a small stall????
If you understand the sutuation,.,... means that you know what are you study about....
What should you do??? Adjust the literature??? OMG... that is terrible... adjust your data??? NO.. is is unethical... then???? End of your study??? That is disaster....
Don't worry dear... it also happend to me last time.. and i just wanna to cry thinking about that without any explanation....
Actually... that is the beauty of your study.., and believed me.. you will got more citation after this if your study are against from past studies... Am i kidding you ??? It is a bad JOKE?????
Nope.. it is true.. especially nowadays.. most of the students are looking to use a moderator for their study and while they wanna to use a moderating factor... there MUST be inconsistency in the literature.... SEE... now you gave them a great help ... now they can use the moderating factor because of your study..... hahahahahaha...
But.. before that.. when have this kind of results... you must argue and explain it logically base on your understanding the environment of your study according to the real situation.. only you know what is happening in your study.. if you could argue that.. it means you understood what are you studying about...
Foe example.... why a sky juice will cause you RM 5.90 in the 5 star hotel and it is only cost you 20 cents in the mamak stall and cost you nothing in a small stall????
If you understand the sutuation,.,... means that you know what are you study about....
No comments:
Post a Comment